Meaning of Merger and Acquisition-
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are described as the incorporation of companies. Separating the two terms, Mergers is the union of two companies to form one, while Acquisitions is one company taken over by the different. M&A is one of the major features of the corporate finance world. The logic behind M&A usually given is that two separate companies mutually create more value linked to being on an original stand. With the objective of revenue maximization, companies have evaluated different possibilities through the way of mergers or acquisitions.
Corporate acquisitions can be identified for legal purposes as either "asset purchases" in which the seller sells company assets to the customer, or "equity purchases" in which the buyer purchases equity shares in a target company from one or more selling shareholders. Asset purchases are accepted in technology transactions where the buyer is most involved in careful intellectual property rights but does not need to acquire responsibilities/liabilities or other contractual bonds. An asset purchase structure may also be applied when the buyer wants to buy a special part or unit of a company that is not a separate legal object. There are various difficulties appropriate to this kind of activity, including separating the particular assets and liabilities that concern to the part, determining whether the unit uses services from different units of the selling company, transferring assistants, giving grants and permits, and assuring that the seller does not play with the buyer in the same business sector in the future.
Structuring the sale of a financially distressed company is uniquely challenging due to the treatment of non-compete agreements, advising agreements, and business goodwill in such activities.
Revelation about Merger & Amalgamation-
Chapter XV (―Compromises, Arrangements, and Amalgamation) of Companies Act, 2013 contains sections 230 to 240 that deal with mergers and acquisitions.
Companies Act, 2013: It gives supplementary disclosures if there is any decrease of the share capital or the case is of corporate debt restructuring where 75% creditors must have agreed. Also, if the auditor doesn‘t give a certificate as proof of the finances of the company, the tribunal is not responsible to confirm the arrangement, according to Section 133 of the Companies Act. Unlike, the earlier act, not only the central government has to be notified about the deal but many others like Income Tax Authorities, Reserve Bank, Official Liquidator, Securities Exchange Board of India, Registrar of Companies, Stock Exchange, Competition Commission of India, etc. If there is any objection by these authorities, it should be filed within thirty (30) days of the report, both the method would go on trouble-free.
The regard of the Merger-
Companies Act, 2013: With-holding the situations wherein not every shareholder is ready to be started at the voting, e-voting is allowed under section 230(6)(1) of Companies Act, 2013. Here a member can cast his vote through messenger vote. This enables all the shareholders to give their votes and hence affect the settlement. The system would have to be supported by three fourth members and approved by National Company Law.
Jurisdiction of Company Law-
The Companies (IInd Amendment) Act 2002, brought out a new forum namely "National Company Law Tribunal and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal" to get a complete jurisdiction of the present then Company Law Board and to a rather large area that of the Civil Courts and High Courts. The Act gives for the work of similar forums where the National Company Law Tribunal ("NCLT") has been vested with skills that are far-reaching in honour of the organization and administration of companies. The provisions were supported by the constitutional bench of the Supreme Court in Union of India v R. Gandhi5. The laws of the NCLT combine powers as broad as "regulation of the conduct of affairs of the company" under Section 242(2)(a), and also various other specific powers. It is relevant to note that the jurisdiction of the Civil Court over the company law matters has always been a debatable subject. The main explanation put forth opposite the Civil Court's jurisdiction is that the area of Company Law Board has been put at par with that of the Civil Court because of which the appeal against any judgment or order of Company Law Board is to be filed before High Court.
Procedure for filing a case before “National Company Law Tribunal”(NCLT)-
Benefits of Company Amalgamation-
For Related Action= “Thelegalbank” Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, 302021.